Discussion:Mundeze

The fact that an artifical language doesn't have printed publications doesn't mean that it is not worth it of having an article. This is a small Wikipedia that is written in an artificial language, so this topic is of interest for the speakers/users of this Wikipedia. The fact that you 1234qwer1234qwer4, are not writing articles here and you don't even speak Occidental, makes me think why are you adding that template to the article. --Caro de Segeda (conversation) 14:15, 14 novembre 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The fact that an artifical language doesn't have reliable secondary sources does mean that it is not worth it of having an article, as this is required by the pillar of neutrality, one of the five pillars of Wikipedia. The fact that a Wikipedia in an artificial language does seem to ignore neutrality when it comes to artificial languages does only shows its arbitrariness about this pillar, and not abiding by its own principles is not what Wikipedia is supposed to do. I do not regularly visit pages on WMF projects in languages I don't speak, but whenever I stumble across a page that I can see does not meet Wikipedia's principles without any knowledge of the language, I am nominating it for deletion as I would on projects in languages I do speak. I also suggest you refrain from making further ad hominem arguments. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (conversation) 14:35, 14 novembre 2020 (UTC)[reply]

On posse vider li Wikipedias in lingues constructet quam su propri mundes o landes con diferent standardes de notabilitá (just quam in altri lingues). Por exemple in Korea (u yo vive) hay un articul pri li jurnalist e meteorologist 박대기 qui es plutost notabil in Korea, ma in null maniere notabil in li Unit States, Germania, etc., ma to ne significa que su págine mey esser deletet. Mithridates (conversation) 16:17, 14 novembre 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Avise:Ping May you please link to the notability guidelines for this Wikipedia, so I can get to know them? 1234qwer1234qwer4 (conversation) 17:32, 14 novembre 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Noi es ancor tro micri por etablisser tal coses. Por ti-ci págine in question yo posse confirmar que it es un lingue plutost bon conosset in li comunité auxlingual. Por saver plu pri li activitás del lingues auxiliari del passate yo posse recomandar li letura del jurnale Kosmoglott, poy Cosmoglotta, in quel vu va trovar que mem long mort lingues ha contribuet mult al developation del idés pruntat de altri lingues e pro to noi es relativmen tolerant a págines pri altri lingues. Li camp self es in general presc ínconosset e noi decovri nov coses del passate chascun die. Mithridates (conversation) 18:30, 14 novembre 2020 (UTC)[reply]